@athertop a long press will give you the answer a glance can't. As a badly designed app showing a number who has no meaning by itself, dropped in a random place.
If you can't find, this the % chance of precipitation for the day.
@athertop a long press will give you the answer a glance can't. As a badly designed app showing a number who has no meaning by itself, dropped in a random place.
If you can't find, this the % chance of precipitation for the day.
Congrats on the new ability to hide components. Even if it's very possibly the most dysfunctional implementation of such a capability. Someone has forgotten basic testing before the release...
It says a lot about the framework or the way it's used 😉
The meteoblue team made clear they have little interest in what customers like or not. Despite the drop on the app notation in the past days. So do not expect any change or even options. They know what's better, whatever color coding for data visualisation studies say for years. Let's hope the team in charge of models is more into science.
Agree the new UI is a clear regression. Whoever did validate this misses basic knowledge on readability and UX basics.
Also, the fact that the UI is now forcing the painful display of useless capabilities. Who does think I have any interest for webcams showing ugly parking lots 20 or 30 km away? Or the never accurate where2go?
In short, Meteoblue was all about easy reading and efficient color codes. Weather at a glance. It's now fuzzy and confusing, forcing the user to think twice before translating the UI to actionable pieces of info. This applies to every aspect, from temp to reliability (those icons... come on).
Good news is that Meteoblue UI now mimics what every other bad weather app does. So, switching will be easier. Subscription is canceled already, on my side.